In the June 2011 issue we have Jim Tolpin building the “Ultimate Router Table.”

Nah, just yanking your chain.

He’s actually building a wombat house.

Ha. Got you.

In truth, Tolpin wrote a great article about how to build and use a “sector.” What’s a sector? It is like magic wands that have been hinged together. With just two sticks and a little hinge, you can use a sector to solve many workshop math problems that would involve nutty fractions, a calculator, or…. horrors…. the metric system.

I prepared a short video about the simple sector I built for our shop. This little video shows only two of the many tricks a sector can do. Look for the complete article in the June 2011 issue of *Popular Woodworking Magazine*.

*— Christopher Schwarz*

Read Jim Tolpin’s “The New Traditional Workshop.”

I was trained in advanced math. One of the mathematicians that taught us (Walter Noll) said over and over again, “Mathematics is the art of avoiding unnecessary calculation.” Seems, that’s what this tool does. And, it replaces measuring with transferring, which is more accurate, no?

Cool! As others have pointed out, this

ismath, just not arithmetic. It’s applying the law of similar triangles from geometry. It’s like the method of angling a ruler between two parallel lines to locate evenly spaced divisions. And the nice thing is, it reduces the human error in transferring numerical values.Although you did need some arithmetic to divide 12 into 6 even sections…

The 13 divisions simply appear to be some convenient short length stepped off repeatedly down the length of the sector. It could have been 10 and worked just as well, though the more divisions the more known points where you can take off the width.

Great video–

EXCELLENT article (I’ve read it twice now and am sure to read it a third time tomorrow) I’ll be making some of these soon or buying the new “rockler sector sticks” as soon as they become available (sure to be in the next couple of months)

Seriously though,

The quality of material/writing in PopWW’ing is so very good (these last couple of issues especially) and I just wanted to throw out a thanks to those of you out there that are working so hard to keep your customers pleased. You’ve certainly earned your paychecks once again.

Lawrence

Sorry, people. Your terminology is all wrong. You are not eliminating “Math” (like calculus, differential equations or string theory). You’re avoiding simple, basic, second or third grade arithmetic. That’s pretty sad. This is just another form of illiteracy that permeates our society. You cannot play banjo (nor dobro or mandolin) without arithmetic. (Bach, Beethoven, Mozart and Me-P. Ochs)

It’s a layout tool, and as such doesn’t eliminate math so much as it eliminates measuring. That’s where the errors often occur.

This reminds me of a book on technical drafting that I was reading the other day, circa late 1800s, before photo-stat blueprints. They had a lot of interesting mechanical methods for dividing spaces, laying things out, or laying out a scale to set dividers to measurements that were accurate to hundredths of an inch.

So much to rediscover. Very exciting.

I don’t know–I’ve never been able to understand why there is so much aversion to math. Watching the video, I couldn’t help thinking that a pencil and a piece of scratch paper are just so much quicker and easier to use than yard-long nunchaku.

-Steve

Such simple elegance.

So if I understand what’s going on here, you might want to somehow highlight #1, #2, #3, #5, #8 and #13. This way you could effortlessly use the sector to develop proportions based on a Fibonacci series. The 8 to 13 ratio (1.625) is very close to Phi the golden section proportion of 1.618.

This device has some promising possibilities worth exploring.

I didn’t get the mag until 2 days ago, and didn’t built one until yesterday. I thought I’d be the first to figure out the Phi relationship!

I really like this as well but have a question. You wrote that you divided the two sticks into 13 equal portions. How do you determine the length of each equal portion? Another thumbs up for the banjo music. 😮 If my Dad was not playing his guitar he was playing his banjo so I grew up loving it. Fred

You use the dividers. Adjust the setting so that you can “step off” 13 (or whatever number of portions you want) along the length of the sector sticks, and make a mark at each “step”. The actual length of each portion doesn’t matter, as long as they are equal.

Looks like an analog computer.

I’ve been meaning to make one of these for years, although I had in mind one more the size and form factor of a four-fold rule. Does anybody sell the hinges for those things?

Follow the link “Make a Sector From a Crappy Folding Rule”!

That’s what I did with a 36″ four-fold that I bought from Garrett Wade a few years ago!

I’m slightly speechless. Apparently, if I were better educated I wouldn’t be as impressed as I am. But this is a tremendous device. Sheesh – I can’t get any work done for building all the great tools you write about, Chris!

It is math, but of a different and more direct kind, like geometry. I like it. It saves my punching numbers into a calculator and using algebraic maneuvers to determine where I need to set the center line, as an example. I wished I learned that way back in high school, but you know how it is, if you’re “college prep”, you’re expected to solve things by coming in sideways through the back door.

Where’s the banjo music??? Did you guys finally run out??

Wait, you LIKED the banjo music?

Man, we got HOURS of the stuff.

Cue the banjo music!

Most certainly did! I actually was sufficiently inspired by it to make a Pandora station with nothing but banjo. My wife is NOT pleased. That’s ok…I’m good with it.

Again, great tool, thanks so much for sharing.

+1 for the banjo music.

I have to agree with Ryan on this one…I don’t think that the math is eliminated at all. In fact, it would seem to me that this is actually a non-electronic fractional calculator, which prevents the user from having to do the math.

Which, of course, means I LOVE it. Thanks for the tip!

PS – I miss the banjo for this one…would have seemed more apropos.

The music reminded me more of a Festool commercial than something Schwarzian.

Love it. I would say, though, that you’re not so much eliminating math as much as you’re just changing the notation!

Another great tip. I actually like math, but NOT while I’m woodworking. I may need to run out to the news stand to get that issue just for that article.