<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=376816859356052&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
 In Techniques

We may receive a commission when you use our affiliate links. However, this does not impact our recommendations.

Solving the practical problems for the use of a table is the first step to developing a successful design.

FIG. 4-52   The relationship between diners and each other and between the table and the room should be considered when sizing a table. A narrow width is intimate, but there may not be room for the turkey on Thanksgiving.

FIG. 4-52 The relationship between diners and each other and between the table and the room should be considered when sizing a table. A narrow width is intimate, but there may not be room for the turkey on Thanksgiving.

Just as chairs were easily categorized on a practical basis, tables can be classified as one of three types: eatin’, relaxin’ or workin’. Within each of these types there are some design parameters that fall in a narrow range, but other parameters that can vary almost infinitely.

The fixed parameters are those of height, followed by the width and depth needed for the task at hand. For dining tables the standard height is 29″ to 30″. Each diner needs some room, so the overall size of the table depends on the number of place settings and the size of the room. Shape and overall size can range from a small round table for one to a huge banquet table in a palace.

The illustrations give some examples of typical shapes and sizes and the number of seats that can be placed around the table. In some of the illustrations, there is a “normal” spacing for place settings along with a “crowded” setting. This is a realistic consideration when trying to determine the size of table needed.

FIG. 4-53 Round dining tables provide more flexibility for seating arrangements than rectangular tables, but there are limits to how many diners can squeeze around the table.

FIG. 4-53 Round dining tables provide more flexibility for seating arrangements than rectangular tables, but there are limits to how many diners can squeeze around the table.

Some references have tried to simplify this by making the number of possible place settings a function of the length of the perimeter of the table. This almost works for round tables, but fails miserably when employed for rectangular tables. When you turn a corner, you need to consider that parts of the available area are width for one diner and depth for the one around the corner.

Also keep in mind the distance across the table. A 30″-wide table will provide a more intimate experience for people across from each other, but there may not be room to place serving dishes and available space at the corners will be limited if you squeeze in an extra seat. A 48″-wide table will give plenty of room for the turkey platter at Thanksgiving but it can be too far to reach across.


Product Recommendations

Here are some supplies and tools we find essential in our everyday work around the shop. We may receive a commission from sales referred by our links; however, we have carefully selected these products for their usefulness and quality.

Recommended Posts
Showing 3 comments
  • jeanne888

    Thanks so much, NickT66! I guess I need new glasses….

  • jeanne888

    Thanks for this very helpful article. Is there a way to save all three pages as one article to my computer (I have a Mac), or must I save it as three parts? Is there a “printer friendly” option I haven’t noticed?

    Thanks~Jeanne

Start typing and press Enter to search