Just a Little Shaker Lap Desk Mistake

Build a Shaker Lap Desk with Chuck Bender DVD coverEarlier this year (before becoming a member of the editorial staff) I teamed up with Popular Woodworking Magazine and presented one of my No BS Woodworking (my online subscription based woodworking show) projects in an online class format. With the impending release of the DVD of that class, “Build a Shaker Lap Desk, with Chuck Bender“, I remembered a funny little story that occurred while recording the episodes.

Late in the summer of 2011 after recording an episode of No BS Woodworking each day for about three weeks straight the crew and I began work on the Shaker lap desk episodes. We had trekked off to the local big box store to purchase the materials for the desk (the whole premise of the build was you could build a very nice piece of furniture using only materials available at your local home center). The Shaker lap desk built in the episodes was adapted from a measured drawing in John Kassay’s The Book of Shaker Furniture.

When I use the term “adapted” it didn’t start out that way. I had basically taken the cut list from Kassay’s book and plotted out exactly how many pine boards I would need to purchase. After gathering the materials at the local home center and returning to the shop, filming of the materials layout began. I laid out all the parts, verbally noting on camera that the left side of the desk was narrower than the right to accommodate the paper drawer. I also mentioned that, for the moment, I was leaving the side full width (the same as the right side) until all the parts were milled and cut to final size. The plan was to cut off the material where the paper drawer was going and use it as the drawer front. This way the color and grain pattern of the drawer front and case side would match. Filming wrapped for the day at that point.

The next day parts were cut to size and dovetail joinery began. After careful layout, I picked up the saw and began cutting dovetails. Immediately after driving home the last set of dovetails I began to explain that, in the next episode, I would be showing how to route the groove for the secondary bottom when it became apparent that I had never cut off the material that was supposed to be the drawer opening. To further complicate matters, I had dovetailed the left side fully into the front and back of the box. It would not be has easy as cutting off the drawer front to fix this problem.Bothlapdesksinprogress copy

After careful deliberation, and a trip back to the home center, it was decided to turn the build into two versions of the same desk; a complex version with the paper drawer (and all the other bells and whistles) and a simple version. In the end it all worked out to the benefit of the show subscribers (and subsequently for the PWM class attendees) because they got to see how to adapt a design and make it into two very different projects. Those who took the online class through Popular Woodworking Magazine got the added benefit of seeing two different methods of finishing the projects; one stained and clear coated and the other milk painted.

staininglapdesk copyIf you head to shopwoodworking.com and purchase a copy of “Build a Shaker Lap Desk with Chuck Bender” the DVD, you’ll be able to benefit from my mistake as well. You’ll get both versions of the lap desk and both finishes plus you’ll get two digital download videos that give you tips on how to divide dovetails evenly and how to quickly and easily remove the waste between the pins of your dovetails.

— Chuck Bender

 

 

20 thoughts on “Just a Little Shaker Lap Desk Mistake

  1. Phillip Kelley

    This is off subject; I received a subscription form today for Popular Woodworking, it included a colored flyer. On the back of the flyer was a picture of a baby cradle. I was just wondering if there were plans available for that piece of furniture anywhere?

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick

      Phillip, the cradle to which you refer is a piece made by North Carolina cabinetmaker Thomas Day – you can read about him in Jerome Bias’ article here: http://www.popularwoodworking.com/interviews/thomas_day and in several links from the recent Renwick exhibition on his work: http://americanart.si.edu/exhibitions/archive/2013/day/

      I’m not sure, but it’s possible that MESDA has measurements of the cradle in their (incredible) files – we don’t have plans available, but if MESDA does have information on file, they’ll be happy to share it with you: http://www.mesda.org/

  2. Johnathon

    I purchased the downloadable version and am in the process of watching it. For people that are interested in building this project it would be helpful to have some form of cultist or at least specific dimensions available (instead of having to watch the video over and over and catch the values that Chuck says as he is making the full sized mockup).

    1. Chuck BenderChuck Bender Post author

      Johnathon,

      After checking into it, a technical glitch was found. The cutlist should now be part of the download. If you still have trouble, shoot me an email (chuck.bender@fwmedia.com) and I’ll send you the cutlist. Thanks for pointing out the problem and sorry for the trouble.

  3. rwyoung

    The store lists two versions, one at $25, the other at $15 and described as “standard definition video”. The store description doesn’t really indicate what “standard definition video” means. Could somebody clarify here or on the shopwoodworking site? Thanks!

    p.s. I hope I used a verb above and correctly too!

    1. Chuck BenderChuck Bender Post author

      The “standard definition video” is in regard to the digital download (the $14.99 version). In reality the DVD (the $24.99 version) is also standard definition, otherwise it would be a Blueray which would be more expensive as the production cost for Blueray is much higher. I believe the description specifically states standard definition so that people are not thinking they are downloading a high definition video.

      Thank you for using a verb…and a noun

  4. Bill Lattanzio

    Wow! And people call me vitriolic! When I want to learn about furniture making, I’ll consult a woodworker. Want I want to read something that sounds like a journalist (might have) wrote it, I’ll read the New York Times. Oh, and want I want to learn the definition of ‘build’ I’ll look it up and find this:
    the physical structure, especially of a person; physique; figure: He had a strong build.
    the manner or form of construction: The house was of modern build.

  5. Nick Webb

    However the verb for what you do with a router is rout, not route.

    Much confusion is caused by the mispronunciation of route which should have an “oo” sound in the middle (“Get you kicks on Route 66) while rout should have an aʊt (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Rhymes:English:-a%CA%8At). This confusion is further compounded by the mispronunciation of the computer ancillary router as “raʊter” when it is in fact a “rooter” as it routes signals through a network, whereas in woodworking routers should be pronounced as “raʊters”.

  6. DonPeregoy

    First off Chuck welcome to the loving gentle all inclusive world of Internet forums . Where kindness and understanding flourish. Where its a persons thoughts and not there adverbs are what count.

    As a builder who built the Build I feel some need for a short testimonial.

    It was educational, enjoyable, enlightening. I gained a lot of confidence working with such thin wood.
    Thanks Don

    1. gumpbelly

      Sweet, finally something that appears to be thread related. Was getting wholly, and completely tired of the English, Penmanship, Grammar lesson on a WOODWORKING board. I only ask, was there anyone who really couldn`t make out the intent of what was being conveyed? For woodworking that is a 10 ring hit, leave the rest at yer toilet.

      To this poster, sorry didn`t mean to ambush you, and am happy you had good luck with the plan. It`s this type of feedback I`m sure WOODWORKERS were looking for. Thanks.

  7. mcjohnson5

    Perhaps you should consult a dictionary before you so callously chastise someone as being ignorant. The word “build” is normally used as a verb, but it can be used as a noun as well. Comments like yours do not contribute anything to the craft, art or however you want to classify woodworking.

  8. jward_1005

    Build is a verb, not a noun. To use it the way you do is just plain ignorant. Go back to furniture making; you don’t understand the fundamentals of writing let alone editing.

COMMENT