Chris Schwarz's Blog

Shaker Workbench No. 2 at Pleasant Hill

Shaker Workbench

The first workbench I encountered at Pleasant Hill was a little non-standard by Shaker standards, but the second workbench was unusual by most any measuring stick for modern workbenches.

It is a bit Roman, a bit English and has a lot of other interesting details worth thinking about. Let’s take a look at some of them.

Why is it Romanesque? The earliest workbenches typically lacked stretchers between the legs. This was a common feature on very early benches all the way up to the bench in the Stent panel. By the 18th century, most workbenches had stretchers between the legs, if only to capture a shelf for tools.

This bench has evidence that at some point someone nailed on one or two stretchers, but I was glad to see they had been removed.

Shaker Workbench

Like a typical Roman bench, the legs are mortised into the top, which is a fairly narrow and thick plank. The back legs kick out at an angle, which is a feature seen on many English workbenches (and benches found on some sailing ships, such as the Vasa).

What is a bit unusual about this bench is that there is a thin shelf at the rear of the benchtop that is supported by bearers, which are mortised into the top and which I suspect are original.

This arrangement is a bit English – it’s a way to use thick wood in only the places where it is absolutely needed.

PHB-2-IMG_4578-(1)

The vises on the bench are typical of a fairly sophisticated 19th-century workbench – a screw-driven tail vise and leg vise. The leg vise is angled, something you see on American and some English workbenches. The mechanism that drives the leg vise is all kinds of newish and wrong. I’d ignore the mallet-like thing driven through the leg for now.

I found this bench quite charming and sturdy (I gave it a careful nudge while the docents weren’t looking). But most of all it is an example of how workbenches don’t evolve in a linear fashion. This bench could have been made at any point between 1500 and 1900.

— Christopher Schwarz

Like workbench talk? Check out the new fully revised edition of “Workbenches: From Design & Theory to Construction & Use.

2 thoughts on “Shaker Workbench No. 2 at Pleasant Hill

  1. tailwagger

    Interesting. I can see the benefit of the shelf in keeping surface area while reducing weight. I guess it’s a natural no-pound, no grunt zone. I would think a challenge would be keeping a thinner, unjoined board coplaner with the plank, and keeping it from twisting?

    After noticing the front leg with the leg vice kicked towards the left side of the bench, it dawned on me for the first time why one would ever kick out a leg at all. Obviously–but not so much to me till now–it’s to transfer load to the ground more efficiently, making the bench that much more stable. 97% of the time one is planing the load is going that-a-direction, for example. (I know, duh!) Now I know why the back legs would kick out towards the back. It’s to compensate for a narrow top, and to stabilize the bench. If one is not going to put a narrow bench against a wall, this would be a good solution I would think.

    1. johnmoran

      Chris, judging by the way the back legs don’t sit flat to the ground, I suspect they are relatively new or else they would have worn flat like the front ones? or they are just crude replacements by someone who didn’t understand.

      Other than that, a fascinating bench, please keep finding and reporting on them.

      Regards – John

Comments are closed.