Work(wo)man’s Compensation

5.21.blogNote the wheel in the lower right corner – ouch.

No, I didn’t drop a chisel on my foot or get bit by the table saw. But I did run into challenges of several sorts in the shop this weekend while working on a Shaker blanket chest with half-blind dovetails for an upcoming issue, and I had no recourse but to compensate for less-than-ideal conditions (which I suspect is something many of us have to do in the shop from time to time).

A few years back, Christopher Schwarz added wheels to my LVL Workbench (a bench he and I built for the Nov. 2009 issue). The wheels are a great modification – especially when the bench needs to be moved the 50 yards from the shop to the photo studio, because LVL is incredibly heavy stuff. The wheels can be  flipped out of the way so that the bench drops back down onto its legs to bring it to my preferred working height, which is 29″ (note that the dimensions given in the article for the bench are sized to a woodworker of a more average height).  But the bench was on its wheels – and, again, LVL is incredibly heavy stuff; I am physically incapable of lifting my bench enough to flip the wheels out of the way (heck – I can barely lift it at all), and I couldn’t ask someone to come in just to make my life easier.

So I was stuck sawing and chopping dovetails at about 5″ higher than is comfortable for me.

When sawing, I had to compensate both with the trajectory of my sawing arm and my wrist angle – which meant that I tired out more quickly because unaccustomed muscles were in play.

The red line indicates where my bench hits when it's on its feet, rather than on the wheels.

The red line indicates where my bench hits when it’s on its feet, rather than on the wheels.

Chopping took even more compensation, in terms of extra time – I couldn’t achieve my usual (admittedly wimpy) mallet swing because I had 5″ less room between the top and bottom of the action (yes, 5″ makes a heck of a difference – at least to me); I figure each half-pin socket took me at least a third longer than usual to clean out because I had to make a few extra cuts on each to reach the baseline. And paring to remove waste in the corners was more of a challenge, too, because I couldn’t get all the way over the work to use my full body weight behind the chisel. Very tiring.

And now, two days later, my shoulders hurt. A lot.

But both the sawing and the chopping challenges are easily solved – I simply have to ask Bob Lang and Glen Huey to help me out and get my bench back to working height.

The bigger challenge, though, is that my eyes (and the rest of me, I suppose) are fast approaching decrepitude; I can no longer focus close up, even with my reading glasses. Today, I went to the eye doctor, assuming the easy fix was a new prescription. And it is – but those glasses would be clear only for very close work (less than 10″)…such as dropping a chisel into a knife line on walnut. Then, I’d have to switch to my “regular” reading glasses for the bulk of the work, no doubt dropping my chisel out of the knife line as I fumble with the specs change. (And then switch to my distance glasses to walk from the shop to the office if I want to clearly see the path.) That seems silly; I need that ultra-close focus for about 1 percent of my week.

Instead, I’m going to invest in an additional bench light and play around with raking angles, in hopes that will make things a little easier to see from a little farther away. And, I’m going to score my layouts more deeply with the cutting gauge and marking knife, so I can more easily find things by feel. Both should help me compensate – at least for a few years, until I break down and buy trifocals. Or begin to work only in light-colored woods, on which layout lines are easier to see.

— Megan Fitzpatrick

p.s. Note that bench height is up there with pins first vs. tails first for fomenting debate. The picture above shows what works for me (or really, what doesn’t work for me) – a 5’6″ predominantly hand-tool user who owns metal-bodied planes. There are no hard and fast rules; there are a lot of opinions. I have no dog in this fight. Or cat.

p.p.s. If you want to read more about the “perfect” bench how to make a bench that’s perfect for you, I recommend “The Workbench Design Book” (which also includes the LVL bench).

 

 

29 thoughts on “Work(wo)man’s Compensation

  1. joey

    Meghan, rather than lowering the bench, how about making a 41/2″ platform that will fit under the bench and bringing yourself to within 1/2″ of your prefered working height. joe

  2. Edward Clarke

    Megan, check out your shipping department and see if they have a johnson bar that you can use. Anyone who moves heavy stuff ( like boxes of books ) is likely to have one. If not, they’ll have a pallet jack and you can use that. Don’t try to use a fork lift unless the shipping manager gives you the ok.

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

      Again, I’m lazy. Much easier to just complain about it, then get help on Monday. I got the joints cut; that’s what matters! (And my shoulder pain is down to a niggling ache).

  3. gumpbelly

    Megan

    The bench has cross braces running it`s length. Determine the distance below them to the ground and buy a jack that will fit under it to help raise it up, Link below is 8.25: tall, but they come in all sizes, and flavors.

    http://www.harborfreight.com/automotive-motorcycle/bottle-jacks/12-ton-heavy-duty-industrial-hydraulic-bottle-jack-69476.html

    For your Granny eyes, forget correction, go with magnification, specifically table mounted magnification.

    http://www.telesightmagnifiers.com/id151.html

    CVS has everything else in the convalescence aisle, walkers, those industrial strength panty liners and all the rest, You`ll be good as a 70 year old in just a few weeks. Remember just keep pushing, if ya quit, well it`s all sliding downhill from there :-)

  4. Milford

    On the glasses issue, I’ve found that in progressives, all of the gradual focal length change takes place in what would otherwise be the reading section of a bifocal lens, thus reducing the actual useful reading section to less than that of a bifocal. The bad news: the need to slightly shift my head sideways when reading page-width lines instead of columns. The good news: no sudden jump in focus, and more of the floor is reasonably in focus when walking around.

  5. Milford

    Instead of going to a junkyard or stealing the jack from your car, is there some structure of the bench (too lazy to dig out the old mag) that is low enough that you could put a block of wood in front of it as a fulcrum and use a length of 2×4 as a lever that you could step on to raise your bench enough to switch the wheels? For some things, I’ve even found that it’s possible to slightly shift the position of whatever by moving my foot sideways while the near legs are off the floor.

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

      Possibly? But the piece to which the wheels are attached on either end flips up under the two two low stretchers…and OK, I’m just lazy. Fine.

  6. jsparrow

    Megan,
    I’m 71 and love my progressive lenses which I have had for years but I also keep several Optivisors handy for close work. I found them cheap at estate sales but they are available from several sources. They are less expensive than Lie-Nielsen’s Magni-Focuser and work much the same way. Love your magazine and your writing.

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

      I think we actually have a dusty pair somewhere in the depths of our storage area; I’ll pull them out and give them a try.

      1. ejcampbell@rcn.com

        I’m 63 and have used either progressive glasses or bifocal contacts for around 15 years. Both work well, though now I’m at the limit of possible correction in the contacts. progressives are much smoother and less intrusive than bifocals.
        -Eric from Woodworking and Bridal Expo

  7. dpmonty

    Hi Megan,
    TJ noted he got progressive lenses and could not get used to them. It takes a month or more for your brain to retrain itself so you unconsciously correct your eye position through the lenses. But after the initial pain it is as close as you can get to having normal eyesight again. No fixed focal points like bifocals or trifocals have. I hate eyeglasses because of the dust , dirt and smudges that are always on them. At 55 I would love to be able to go back to my youth when I had perfect eyesight. But that’s not going to happen and progressives are the next best option.

    Take Care, Dave

  8. TJ

    I have the same issue with my 55 year old eyes. I have to have a pair for working on the computer and another for reading. Distance is good for the moment. I got a pair of progressive lenses and never got used to them.

    I have a magnifying glass/light at my workbench for those very close up needs.

    TJ

  9. iwigle

    Hey Megan,
    Next time you’re at the junk yard, pick up a used car jack. Should be a lot easier than calling Bob or Glen in on a weekend…

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

      Yes, the next time I’m at the junkyard, I’ll do that. (Note, it would also be, I think, my first time at the junkyard.)

    1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

      Nope. Not gonna do it. Yet. (My glasses are too small even for bifocals; I’ve yet to find a frame I like that would allow it.)

      1. oldster

        “Woman…thy name is vanity” :-)

        At 78, I use a lot of touch and feel, and I have been wearing tri-focals for 30 years. In looking at your set up, I assume that you are doing the same with the back of the saw frame resting on the case. It provides you with a “close but no cigar” horizontal line. That is also assuming that you are using a normal blade rather than a spiral.

        At the risk of arousing your anger, may I humbly suggest that you get a pair of tri’s for use in the shop (normally, you would be by yourself), and continue to use the singles at the office. Nobody has to know.

        Lee (the saw guy)

        1. Megan Fitzpatrick Post author

          At the risk of pedantry (and tmi), the diff between my reading and super-close vision is only 2 steps – and apparently lens makers require a 3-step focal diff to do it…so no tri-focals. Yet. And actually, I don’t have any trouble seeing while coping out waste – it’s lining up the chisel for only the first cut that is a bear!

          1. pmac

            In the short term, try moving your glasses out toward the end of your nose. This little trick will help you see up-close a little better and allow you to line up the chisel. Should work for you until you run out of nose, but by then you will probably have hit the magic 3-step focal diff and can get the trifocals. (I’m speaking from experience here.)

COMMENT