<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=376816859356052&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
 In Shop Blog, Tools

We may receive a commission when you use our affiliate links. However, this does not impact our recommendations.

We’ve just added to our store what I think is one of the most important woodworking books I’ve seen in some time: “Make a Joint Stool from a Tree: An Introduction to 17th-century Joinery,” by Jennie Alexander and Peter Follansbee (Lost Art Press).

Sure, given my interest in all things early modern, I’m partial to this particular form of furniture that was ubiquitous in the 16th and early 17th centuries. But the book is more than a step-by-step approach to building a joint stool – though it is that, and imparted so clearly that the stool is a project a beginner could tackle, from tree to finished piece. The book is also a labor of love for its authors, who have been collaborating on this book for more than two decades. (And the way it happened is a great story – but not one that I’m going to give away here; it’s in the book’s introduction.)

Perhaps more important though, what they’ve dug up about joint stools in their research into the few extant written sources and from examining the furniture also impacts our understanding about how most of the furniture in the period was built – and just how sturdy those pieces really were…and are. After more than three centuries, many period pieces have joints that are as solid today as the day they were constructed. And that’s a lesson we can use in what we build today, no matter the style.

It’s also simply a lovely book. It’s the first oversized (9″ x 12″), full-color book from Lost Art Press, and is printed in the U.S. on acid-free paper with a sewn binding, covered in navy cloth with a full-color dust jacket. You can read more about it, and order your copy, in our bookstore.

Another project suitable for introduction to early modern pieces (OK, OK – Elizabethan, or Renaissance…I hope none of my literature professors are reading this) is an oak Bible Box, like the one shown at right – even with the fancy carving. Especially if you have Peter Follansbee to teach you in person. And there are still a few spaces available in the four-day Bible Box/Valuables Box class Peter is teaching from April 17-20 at The Woodwright’s School in Pittsboro, N.C. (Click on the link above, then scroll down to “Four Day Workshop” in the right-hand navigation bar.) As in the joint stool class I took from Peter last year, you start with a log and end up with a project. (Or in my case, a still-almost-finished project….)

And finally, while we have an excerpt of “Make a Joint Stool from a Tree” in an upcoming issue of Popular Woodworking Magazine, it will be only five pages. And there are 128 pages in the book. I can’t recommend highly enough that you add it to your woodworking library. (I also can’t recommend highly enough taking a class with Peter – especially when you also get to hang out with St. Roy.)

— Megan Fitzpatrick


Product Recommendations

Here are some supplies and tools we find essential in our everyday work around the shop. We may receive a commission from sales referred by our links; however, we have carefully selected these products for their usefulness and quality.

Recommended Posts
Showing 8 comments
  • lastwordsmith

    I just got my copy, and I’m really enjoying it so far (despite one or two typos). I’m probably in the minority here, but I wish the book had even more historical information. I love the detailed pictures of the original pieces showing the joinery. Since most museums won’t let me turn their antique furniture upside down, I’m always excited when a book gives me some close-up pictures and descriptions.

    As to naming the eras… yeah. Renaissance, Elizabethan, Jacobean, early modern… I sometimes just fall back on century names, which I can’t even do with Shakespeare because he spans two centuries. “In late-sixteenth/early-seventeeth-century drama…” Cumbersome to say the least. I have the same problems with my area of specialization, 20th century literature. “Victorian” goes all the way to 1914, even though “Modernist” writers are active in the 1910s, and at some point there’s a shift to “Postmodernism” though nobody can say precisely when.

    Why can’t cultural movements be sensible and schedule all their revolutions for years ending in 00?

    -Steve

  • thomaswhoyt

    thanks for the reply and the ideas. btw, I thought of getting you a ‘gift’ recently.
    Local newspaper here in KY listed

    “FREE. Two Siamese Outdoor cats. Not very Friendly. Not good with children.” I didn’t go pick ’em up. I may be able to locate them if your feral cat population is down…. Could probably keep ’em in a box until the weekend.

  • thomaswhoyt

    suggestion- when publishing one may increase sales by remembering those who don’t have a lathe and/or not artistic enuf to use one!

Start typing and press Enter to search