<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Different Dovetail Joinery</title> <atom:link href="http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery</link> <description>Woodworking advice, woodworking plans, woodworking projects and woodworking blogs</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mark Maleski</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery/comment-page-1#comment-20136</link> <dc:creator>Mark Maleski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:05:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=106730#comment-20136</guid> <description><![CDATA[Fair answer, Glen.  I was thrown by your statement &quot;The joint is a full-blind dovetail...&quot; I thought perhaps you could see gaps or other indicators to confirm the joint.  I can&#039;t think of another joinery method that would hold so well over the years, so you&#039;ve convinced me.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair answer, Glen.  I was thrown by your statement &#8220;The joint is a full-blind dovetail&#8230;&#8221; I thought perhaps you could see gaps or other indicators to confirm the joint.  I can&#8217;t think of another joinery method that would hold so well over the years, so you&#8217;ve convinced me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery/comment-page-1#comment-20124</link> <dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:17:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=106730#comment-20124</guid> <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a great looking joint!  I think a standard (mitered) full blind dovetail would not look right here.  Were you able to observe the joint at the back side of the desk or is it covered with a panel?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great looking joint!  I think a standard (mitered) full blind dovetail would not look right here.  Were you able to observe the joint at the back side of the desk or is it covered with a panel?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glen D. Huey</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery/comment-page-1#comment-20062</link> <dc:creator>Glen D. Huey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:43:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=106730#comment-20062</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks a great question, Mark. The top of the desk was held firm (for 200 plus years) and there are no signs of any other joinery method, or nails. I suppose the desk top could have been doweled to the side, but that seems highly unlikely given the quality of the work elsewhere on the desk. In your opinion, what joinery method could have been used? Anyone? The only way to confirm the connection would be to dismantle the desk, or possibly to have it x-rayed.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a great question, Mark. The top of the desk was held firm (for 200 plus years) and there are no signs of any other joinery method, or nails. I suppose the desk top could have been doweled to the side, but that seems highly unlikely given the quality of the work elsewhere on the desk. In your opinion, what joinery method could have been used? Anyone? The only way to confirm the connection would be to dismantle the desk, or possibly to have it x-rayed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Maleski</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/editors-blog/different-dovetail-joinery/comment-page-1#comment-20058</link> <dc:creator>Mark Maleski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:31:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=106730#comment-20058</guid> <description><![CDATA[If it is fully blind, how could you tell this joinery method was was used on the original period piece?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is fully blind, how could you tell this joinery method was was used on the original period piece?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 374/469 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2amilv9vi9flo.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.popularwoodworking.com @ 2013-05-22 14:56:37 by W3 Total Cache -->