<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Stanley No. 65: My Favorite Tool of 2010</title> <atom:link href="http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010</link> <description>Woodworking advice, woodworking plans, woodworking projects and woodworking blogs</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ken</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14884</link> <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:45:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14884</guid> <description><![CDATA[To the gentleman wanting to know where to look for one, I would keep an eye on jimbodetools.com. They have new (old) tools daily.  You can sign up for their email to get a daily update.Your pocket book may hate me for mentioning this site.  I&#039;ve certainly found a bunch of &quot;gotta have&quot; tools there.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the gentleman wanting to know where to look for one, I would keep an eye on jimbodetools.com. They have new (old) tools daily.  You can sign up for their email to get a daily update.</p><p>Your pocket book may hate me for mentioning this site.  I&#8217;ve certainly found a bunch of &quot;gotta have&quot; tools there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike DeCarlo</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14883</link> <dc:creator>Mike DeCarlo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:57:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14883</guid> <description><![CDATA[Great plane, I&#039;ll definitely be on the look out for one!
Also, love your magazine!Mike
decarlowoodworks.blogspot.com]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great plane, I&#8217;ll definitely be on the look out for one!<br
/> Also, love your magazine!</p><p>Mike<br
/> decarlowoodworks.blogspot.com</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher Schwarz</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14882</link> <dc:creator>Christopher Schwarz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:55:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14882</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wrote a story on stop chamfers and lamb&#039;s tongue details that will come out in the Lee Valley newsletter. Should be out in December I think.Chris]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a story on stop chamfers and lamb&#8217;s tongue details that will come out in the Lee Valley newsletter. Should be out in December I think.</p><p>Chris</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: theparttimewoodworker.blogspot.com</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14881</link> <dc:creator>theparttimewoodworker.blogspot.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14881</guid> <description><![CDATA[Chris, I have been trying to do a &quot;proper&quot; stopped chamfer for months now. I have discovered that creating a chamfer is easy, it is the &quot;proper&quot; part of the equation that fails me.Could you either post a short explanation regarding your technique or direct me to one of your books or blogs that includes it?I would greatly appreciate it.Peace]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I have been trying to do a &quot;proper&quot; stopped chamfer for months now. I have discovered that creating a chamfer is easy, it is the &quot;proper&quot; part of the equation that fails me.</p><p>Could you either post a short explanation regarding your technique or direct me to one of your books or blogs that includes it?</p><p>I would greatly appreciate it.</p><p>Peace</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Cashman</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14880</link> <dc:creator>John Cashman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:46:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14880</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have the Kunz version. I purchased it somewhere around 1980, give or take a year. There were no resources back then to tell me how bad the tool was, or what to do about it, but it wasn&#039;t hard to figure out.There was lots of paint where paint didn&#039;t belong, so that had to come off. Some file work on the bed and both top and bottom of the cap smoothed things out. The cap was really chunky, so I had to take a lot off the top so the shavings would pass through smoothly. I have no idea how long it took to make it work the way it should, but I doubt it was an exorbitant amount.The sole is very round front to back, more so than some of the shaves that are supposed to be rounded. I think this is a big plus. You can cut tighter concave surfaces, and on flat work you can set it to take a heavy cut, and rock the tool back a bit to take a finer shaving, without having to adjust the blade.I&#039;ve never used a Stanley 65, but for many years the Kunz was my favorite spokeshave, even with the chamfer guides off. In fact, I&#039;ve used it more with the guides off than on.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Kunz version. I purchased it somewhere around 1980, give or take a year. There were no resources back then to tell me how bad the tool was, or what to do about it, but it wasn&#8217;t hard to figure out.</p><p>There was lots of paint where paint didn&#8217;t belong, so that had to come off. Some file work on the bed and both top and bottom of the cap smoothed things out. The cap was really chunky, so I had to take a lot off the top so the shavings would pass through smoothly. I have no idea how long it took to make it work the way it should, but I doubt it was an exorbitant amount.</p><p>The sole is very round front to back, more so than some of the shaves that are supposed to be rounded. I think this is a big plus. You can cut tighter concave surfaces, and on flat work you can set it to take a heavy cut, and rock the tool back a bit to take a finer shaving, without having to adjust the blade.</p><p>I&#8217;ve never used a Stanley 65, but for many years the Kunz was my favorite spokeshave, even with the chamfer guides off. In fact, I&#8217;ve used it more with the guides off than on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/woodworking-blogs/chris-schwarz-blog/stanley-no-65-my-favorite-tool-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-14879</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:25:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.woodworking-magazine.com/blog/Stanley+No+65+My+Favorite+Tool+Of+2010.aspx#comment-14879</guid> <description><![CDATA[Chris,Should I assume that any 65&#039;s I find will now be double the price that they were this morning?  A quick ebay search revealed that there are not any available, there was probably a run on them five minutes after you posted.  In all honesty though I have never seen this tool (or didn&#039;t recognize it) when looking through vintage tools.  Was it very common? I&#039;ve seen the No. 72 chamfer plane show up but never this shave, any idea where to find one?Thanks for sharing this; it looks like a very interesting tool.Mike Mitchell]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p><p>Should I assume that any 65&#8242;s I find will now be double the price that they were this morning?  A quick ebay search revealed that there are not any available, there was probably a run on them five minutes after you posted.  In all honesty though I have never seen this tool (or didn&#8217;t recognize it) when looking through vintage tools.  Was it very common? I&#8217;ve seen the No. 72 chamfer plane show up but never this shave, any idea where to find one?</p><p>Thanks for sharing this; it looks like a very interesting tool.</p><p>Mike Mitchell</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 515/527 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2amilv9vi9flo.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.popularwoodworking.com @ 2013-06-20 08:22:56 by W3 Total Cache -->