<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: CPSC Table Saw Rules: Emotion vs. Numbers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers</link> <description>Woodworking advice, woodworking plans, woodworking projects and woodworking blogs</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: GunnyGene</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21185</link> <dc:creator>GunnyGene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21185</guid> <description><![CDATA[PS:  I figured it out.  The comment site doesn&#039;t like FireFox.  Works ok in Chrome.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS:  I figured it out.  The comment site doesn&#8217;t like FireFox.  Works ok in Chrome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GunnyGene</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21182</link> <dc:creator>GunnyGene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:10:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21182</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ok.  I cleared the cache, and got to the regulations.gov and found the document.  But they won&#039;t let me submit a comment.  I get the same message as above.  I have cookies enabled, and am not blocking scripts.I guess they are going to force people to use snail mail.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok.  I cleared the cache, and got to the regulations.gov and found the document.  But they won&#8217;t let me submit a comment.  I get the same message as above.  I have cookies enabled, and am not blocking scripts.</p><p>I guess they are going to force people to use snail mail.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert W. Lang</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21178</link> <dc:creator>Robert W. Lang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:25:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21178</guid> <description><![CDATA[You may be viewing a cached version of this post, links are currently working. You can get there from www.regulations.govBob Lang]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be viewing a cached version of this post, links are currently working. You can get there from <a
href="http://www.regulations.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.regulations.gov</a></p><p>Bob Lang</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GunnyGene</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21175</link> <dc:creator>GunnyGene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21175</guid> <description><![CDATA[The link you provided for comment says:&lt;i&gt;&quot;Document does not existThe document you requested does not exist on Regulations.gov. The Web address may be incorrect, or the document may have been withdrawn.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link you provided for comment says:</p><p><i>&#8220;Document does not exist</p><p>The document you requested does not exist on Regulations.gov. The Web address may be incorrect, or the document may have been withdrawn.&#8221;</i></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Recruiter</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21165</link> <dc:creator>Recruiter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21165</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have always been on the side of &quot;Don&#039;t use the tools, unless you know how&quot;.  In this case, they can be extremely dangerous.  Education is the key, not government mandates.
When I took my first shop class in school, I remember my teacher giving us a long lesson on the proper way to use the table saw.  He immediately followed up with a demonstration on the effects when you don&#039;t pay attention.  With everyone out of the way, he proceded to put a board through the running blade, and let it kickback.  It threw the board sailing 30 feet, and smashed into the far wall.
That leaves an impression and a lot of respect for the tool.
If you don&#039;t use the tool properly, its only a matter of time, before you are going to have an accident.  This, to me, is a case where the government is going to regulate the table saw so tightly, that people are going to be complacent, and accidents that weren&#039;t happening before, will start to happen, because they may take more chances.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been on the side of &#8220;Don&#8217;t use the tools, unless you know how&#8221;.  In this case, they can be extremely dangerous.  Education is the key, not government mandates.<br
/> When I took my first shop class in school, I remember my teacher giving us a long lesson on the proper way to use the table saw.  He immediately followed up with a demonstration on the effects when you don&#8217;t pay attention.  With everyone out of the way, he proceded to put a board through the running blade, and let it kickback.  It threw the board sailing 30 feet, and smashed into the far wall.<br
/> That leaves an impression and a lot of respect for the tool.<br
/> If you don&#8217;t use the tool properly, its only a matter of time, before you are going to have an accident.  This, to me, is a case where the government is going to regulate the table saw so tightly, that people are going to be complacent, and accidents that weren&#8217;t happening before, will start to happen, because they may take more chances.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tpobrienjr</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21163</link> <dc:creator>tpobrienjr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:10:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21163</guid> <description><![CDATA[While we&#039;re at it, how about a performance-based specification for table saws that would eliminate kickback, which might not mangle your hands but has plenty of ability to to cause trauma?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re at it, how about a performance-based specification for table saws that would eliminate kickback, which might not mangle your hands but has plenty of ability to to cause trauma?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tpobrienjr</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21162</link> <dc:creator>tpobrienjr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21162</guid> <description><![CDATA[Some wise fella once wrote that nothing can be made foolproof - there are too many fools.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some wise fella once wrote that nothing can be made foolproof &#8211; there are too many fools.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tpobrienjr</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21161</link> <dc:creator>tpobrienjr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:01:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21161</guid> <description><![CDATA[It seems to me that a good alternative to the Gass patent has been overlooked.No solution I&#039;ve seen, including the PTI solution, uses a clutch and brake.  If the arbor is disconnected from the motor shaft by a clutch, then stopped by a brake, it can be done pretty fast - in a few milliseconds.  The reason is that the angular momentum of the motor is removed from the picture when a clutch disconnects it from the arbor.  Then the arbor, having much less angular momentum, can be stopped by a suitable brake.  I would also consider making the arbor from a lightweight alloy, which would also have a somewhat smaller moment of inertia.  Jamming a moving blade, with the motor&#039;s momentum attached, into an aluminum block, seems to be a brute-force approach.This approach I describe avoids destroying the blade, but it might need to use the Gass patent&#039;s flesh-sensing technology or some other technology to operate quickly enough.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that a good alternative to the Gass patent has been overlooked.</p><p>No solution I&#8217;ve seen, including the PTI solution, uses a clutch and brake.  If the arbor is disconnected from the motor shaft by a clutch, then stopped by a brake, it can be done pretty fast &#8211; in a few milliseconds.  The reason is that the angular momentum of the motor is removed from the picture when a clutch disconnects it from the arbor.  Then the arbor, having much less angular momentum, can be stopped by a suitable brake.  I would also consider making the arbor from a lightweight alloy, which would also have a somewhat smaller moment of inertia.  Jamming a moving blade, with the motor&#8217;s momentum attached, into an aluminum block, seems to be a brute-force approach.</p><p>This approach I describe avoids destroying the blade, but it might need to use the Gass patent&#8217;s flesh-sensing technology or some other technology to operate quickly enough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert W. Lang</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21154</link> <dc:creator>Robert W. Lang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21154</guid> <description><![CDATA[On page 192 (page 7 of TAB C)of this document from CPSC:http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/FOIA11/brief/tablesaw.pdfis the following statement:&quot;SawStop has also developed a prototype bench saw, which will probably cost just under $1,000.
This is expensive for a bench saw, several hundred dollars more than the most expensive bench saw ($600, according to PTI) currently available.&quot;Bob Lang]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On page 192 (page 7 of TAB C)of this document from CPSC:</p><p><a
href="http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/FOIA11/brief/tablesaw.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/FOIA11/brief/tablesaw.pdf</a></p><p>is the following statement:</p><p>&#8220;SawStop has also developed a prototype bench saw, which will probably cost just under $1,000.<br
/> This is expensive for a bench saw, several hundred dollars more than the most expensive bench saw ($600, according to PTI) currently available.&#8221;</p><p>Bob Lang</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert W. Lang</title><link>http://www.popularwoodworking.com/article/cpsc-table-saw-rules-emotion-vs-numbers/comment-page-1#comment-21153</link> <dc:creator>Robert W. Lang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.popularwoodworking.com/?p=109967#comment-21153</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve added (retail price) to the sentence up above to clarify that part of the post. And I&#039;m off to dig through my notes about that.Bob Lang]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added (retail price) to the sentence up above to clarify that part of the post. And I&#8217;m off to dig through my notes about that.</p><p>Bob Lang</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 495/614 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2amilv9vi9flo.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.popularwoodworking.com @ 2013-05-21 19:06:38 by W3 Total Cache -->